Padgett Law Group
Menu

PLG NEWS

News + updates + recent press

Categories

All
Arkansas
Bankruptcy
Case Law
Closings
Compliance
Evictions
FDCPA
FHA
Florida
Foreclosure
Georgia
Illinois
Indiana
Kentucky
Legislative
Michigan
Moratoriums
Ohio
PANDIFFERENT
Pennsylvania
Personnel
Real Estate
Regulatory
REO
Tennessee
Texas
Title
Trending Cases

Archives

January 2023
November 2022
September 2022
August 2022
June 2022
April 2022
March 2022
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
August 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
February 2019
January 2019
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
March 2018
January 2018
December 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017

New Administrative Order and Chapter 13 Plan in Middle District of Florida

7/13/2020

 
On July 9, 2020, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida entered
Administrative order FLMB 2020-7 Proscribing Procedures for Chapter 13 Cases Filed on or After August 1, 2020 and Revised Model Chapter 13 Plan, effective August 1, 2020.

What has changed?
​
One of the most fundamental changes that will impact creditors is paragraph 10 (ten) titled
Reimposition of the Automatic Stay. It reads as follows: “If Debtor files an amended or modified Plan
that includes payments to a secured creditor or lessor in the Plan payments, the automatic stay is
reimposed as to that secured creditor or lessor automatically upon the filing of the amended or
modified Plan unless the secured creditor or lessor has concluded its state law foreclosure or
repossession remedies. Debtor must serve the amended or modified Plan upon the affected creditor or lessor.”
Analysis of the changes
This provision is particularly troubling for a number of reasons. For one, pursuant to §362(c)(3)(A), if the debtor had 1 or more prior cases pending within the preceding year, the automatic stay terminates on the 30th day unless a motion is filed and hearing held prior to day 30. By contrast, §362(c)(4)(B) provides that if the debtor had 2 or more prior cases pending within the preceding year, the automatic stay does not go into effect upon the filing of the later case unless a motion is filed within 30 days after the order for relief is entered (i.e. the case filing). Thus, in these “serial filing” cases, a motion must be filed and hearing held. It is unknown how, if at all, this new administrative order and model chapter 13 plan will impact this. 

Nonetheless, assuming the debtor is not a serial filer and §362(c)(3) and (4) do not apply, the debtor will not be required to file a Motion to Reimpose Automatic Stay. Rather, the debtor is only required to file and serve the amended or modified plan, which has the effect of reimposing the automatic stay upon being filed. 

Other jurisdictions abide by Bankruptcy Rule 7001 which requires the filing of an adversary proceeding in order to reimpose the automatic stay. For instance, Rule 7001(7) states “a proceeding to obtain an injunction or other equitable relief, except when a chapter 9, chapter 11, chapter 12, or chapter 13 plan provides for the relief.” Asking that the automatic stay be reimposed is seeking injunctive relief. Yet, FLMB 2020-7 and the Revised Model Chapter 13 Plan may circumvent this provision since the chapter 13 plan does provide for the relief (i.e the automatic stay being reimposed). 

Co-Debtor Stay?
FLMB 2020-7 and the Revised Model Chapter 13 Plan are silent as to the co-debtor stay. It should be noted that §362 which governs the automatic stay and §1301 which governs the co-debtor stay are not mutually exclusive. Therefore, although the automatic stay may be in place, the co-debtor stay may not be.

Impact moving forward 
It is imperative that counsel review all amended and modified plans to determine whether or not the automatic stay is in place and if so, immediately place the foreclosure or replevin on hold while reviewing its available legal remedies. This may include opposing the amended/modified plan as well as seeking further clarification from the court. 

Proposed Local Rule Change Southern District of Florida
The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida has proposed changes to its local rules. One of those in particular being Local Rule 3070, which deals with chapter 13 payments.  Of importance, is the proposed change that incorporates the Mortgage Modification Mediation (“MMM”) program and makes clear that 3002.1 Notices are for notice purpose only during the mediation process, and the debtor is not required to file an objection due to the pending mediation. 
Other proposed changes include the debtor being required to respond to all 3002.1 payment change notices within 30 days. 

Comments are closed.
    PLG BLOG DISCLAIMER
    ​The information contained on this blog shall not constitute legal advice or a legal opinion. The existence of or review and/or use of this blog or any information hereon does not and is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship. Further, no information on this blog should be construed as investment advice. Independent legal and financial advice should be sought before using any information obtained from this blog. It is important to note that the cases are subject to change with future court decisions or other changes in the law. For the most up-to-date information, please contact Padgett Law Group (“PLG”). PLG shall have no liability whatsoever to any user of this blog or any information contained hereon, for any claim(s) related in any way to the use of this blog.  Users hereby release and hold harmless PLG of and from any and all liability for any claim(s), whether based in contract or in tort, including, but not limited to, claims for lost profits or consequential, exemplary, incidental, indirect, special, or punitive damages arising from or related to their use of the information contained on this blog or their inability to use this blog. This Blog is provided on an "as is" basis without warranties of any kind, either express or implied, including, but not limited to, warranties of title or implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. 
HOME
ABOUT
PRACTICE AREAS
CAREERS
CONTACT US
Picture
Picture

Padgett Law Group and Padgett Law Group EP are D/B/As of Timothy D. Padgett, P.A. Timothy D. Padgett, P.A.'s practice areas include creditors' rights, estate planning and probate, real estate transactions and litigation. Not all practices or services are available in all states in which Timothy D. Padgett, P.A. practices.
PRIVACY STATEMENT | WEBSITE DESIGN BY SQFT.MANAGEMENT
  • HOME
  • ABOUT PADGETT
    • THE DIFFERENCE
    • AFFILIATIONS
  • STATES OF SERVICE
    • FLORIDA
    • GEORGIA
    • TENNESSEE
    • ARKANSAS
    • TEXAS
    • OHIO
    • INDIANA
    • PENNSYLVANIA
    • MISSISSIPPI
    • ALABAMA
  • PRACTICE AREAS
    • NATIONAL
    • FORECLOSURE
    • BANKRUPTCY
    • REGULATORY AFFAIRS
    • LITIGATION
    • REO, TITLE, & EVICTIONS
    • CLOSINGS
    • LOSS MITIGATION
  • PLG NEWS
  • CAREERS
  • CLOSINGS
  • CONTACT US
  • HOME
  • ABOUT PADGETT
    • THE DIFFERENCE
    • AFFILIATIONS
  • STATES OF SERVICE
    • FLORIDA
    • GEORGIA
    • TENNESSEE
    • ARKANSAS
    • TEXAS
    • OHIO
    • INDIANA
    • PENNSYLVANIA
    • MISSISSIPPI
    • ALABAMA
  • PRACTICE AREAS
    • NATIONAL
    • FORECLOSURE
    • BANKRUPTCY
    • REGULATORY AFFAIRS
    • LITIGATION
    • REO, TITLE, & EVICTIONS
    • CLOSINGS
    • LOSS MITIGATION
  • PLG NEWS
  • CAREERS
  • CLOSINGS
  • CONTACT US