News + updates + recent press
Florida’s Fourth DCA Confirms the One-Year Statute of Limitations for a Deficiency Action Brought Within a Foreclosure Case
On December 9, 2020, in Accardi v. Regions Bank, No. 4D20-0662, the Fourth DCA held that the one-year statute of limitations specified in section 95.11(5)(h), Fla. Stat., applies to a motion for deficiency judgment brought within an existing mortgage foreclosure action. The Court also determined the limitation period began with the issuance of the Certificate of Title.
Prior to reviewing the Court’s ruling, the timeline of events within the case are crucial to the statute of limitations analysis.
This case involves the application of the statute of limitations contained in section 95.11(5)(h), which provides a one-year statute of limitations in an action to enforce a claim of a deficiency related to a note secured by a mortgage against a residential property. The statute establishes that the limitations period shall commence on the day after the certificate is issued by the clerk of court or the day after the mortgagee accepts a deed in lieu of foreclosure.
The Court determined that because subsection (5)(h) applies to “an action to enforce a claim of a deficiency,” it is essential to focus on how Chapter 95 defines an “action.” Section 95.011, provides, in pertinent part: “a civil action or proceeding, called ‘action’ in this chapter… shall be barred unless begun within the time prescribed in this chapter or, if a different time is prescribed elsewhere in these statutes, within the time prescribed elsewhere.”
The Fourth DCA held that a motion for deficiency, even within an existing mortgage foreclosure lawsuit, amounts to a “civil action or proceeding” within the meaning of statute. Accordingly, the statute of limitations to bring a deficiency action relating to a residential foreclosure is one-year from the issuance of the Certificate of Title.
Comments are closed.
PLG BLOG DISCLAIMER
The information contained on this blog shall not constitute legal advice or a legal opinion. The existence of or review and/or use of this blog or any information hereon does not and is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship. Further, no information on this blog should be construed as investment advice. Independent legal and financial advice should be sought before using any information obtained from this blog. It is important to note that the cases are subject to change with future court decisions or other changes in the law. For the most up-to-date information, please contact Padgett Law Group (“PLG”). PLG shall have no liability whatsoever to any user of this blog or any information contained hereon, for any claim(s) related in any way to the use of this blog. Users hereby release and hold harmless PLG of and from any and all liability for any claim(s), whether based in contract or in tort, including, but not limited to, claims for lost profits or consequential, exemplary, incidental, indirect, special, or punitive damages arising from or related to their use of the information contained on this blog or their inability to use this blog. This Blog is provided on an "as is" basis without warranties of any kind, either express or implied, including, but not limited to, warranties of title or implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.